Strange ending

[bennythedip2]

Froch takes contentious KO win
Carl Froch clambered up from a shocking first-round knockdown to retain his WBA and IBF super-middleweight titles with a controversial ninth-round stoppage of George Groves in Manchester.
Froch wins as the fight comes to a controversial end

Froch was floored by a flinging right hand in the opening moments but clawed his way back into the bout and won a spectacular duel when referee Howard Foster jumped in to end the contest in the ninth.

Foster's intervention with Groves still on his feet sparked uproar, with both corner teams briefly squaring off in the ring while a crowd which had started off resolutely pro-Froch roundly cheered the challenger.

Questions were inevitably raised about the eagerness of Foster to end the fight which had rocked and rolled from one fighter to the other and produced some of the finest action seen in a British ring for some time.

Froch was staggered on his feet in a sensational sixth before retaliating with big shots of his own, and the ending when it came seemed premature but in Foster's favour Groves did appear to be offering little resistance.

Froch may have mocked Groves' credentials for sharing the same ring during the acrimonious big-fight build-up and appeared to believe he was due an easy and enjoyable night - but it proved anything but.

Despite Groves heading into the ring with an unbeaten 19-fight record, he had showed few signs of what was to come with arguably his best wins coming over his ex-amateur rival James DeGale and ageing Jamaican Glen Johnson at the end of last year.

But Groves had appeared unfazed by Froch's claims, even during a distinctly unusual build-up to the fight which saw him split with career-long trainer Adam Booth and instead put his faith in his former bag man Paddy Fitzpatrick.

Groves had revealed intricate details of how he planned to take the fight to Froch but it was clear from the outset he would also be up against the vast majority of the 20,000-capacity crowd who booed him to the ring.

Amazingly, Groves did almost exactly as he had promised, coming out crouched behind his jab and finding some early success.

The challenger took control of the centre of the ring and landed enough to redden the champion's nose in the early exchanges, and it became abundantly clear Froch was not going to have it all his own way.

What followed stunned the capacity crowd as Groves rammed home a right hand which floored Froch for only the second time in his career, before two more rights on the bell emphatically gave the challenger the first round.

Froch looked more settled at the start of the second but again appeared jolted by a pinpoint left hand from Groves before responding with his best shots of the bout so far, a pair of rights to the body which briefly stopped his opponent in his tracks.

Groves was making a mockery of many pre-fight predictions as he waded out for the third, connecting with two more sharp jabs and a cuffing left hook before the champion responded by landing a left and drawing the challenger in the kind of rugged exchange he preferred.

Groves withstood the assault and showed no signs of fading early in the fourth, once again taking to the front foot and stalking the champion, who showed the first signs of frustration when he was warned by referee Howard Foster for hitting on the break.

Froch edged a tighter fifth but waded right back into trouble in a furious sixth in which Groves clattered home swinging shots with both hands and almost had Froch out on his feet - yet a sensational round ended with Froch flinging back bombs and coming close to a knockdown himself.

After an inevitably quieter seventh, Froch started the eighth with two right hands and a serious warning from referee Foster for illegal use of his forearm, and another thrilling exchange once again brought the crowd to its feet.

The action came to a clattering and sudden end in the ninth when after a close-quarters exchange Groves appeared to turn his back and drop his hands, and as Froch poured in unanswered punches referee Foster quickly jumped in to end the contest.

Boos rang down from the capacity crowd when the verdict was announced, sealing a remarkable turnaround for brave Groves who exited to a hero's ovation.

Froch immediately vowed to clear up any discontent by offering Groves a rematch - and insisted referee Foster had no option but to call off the contest.

Froch said: "Howard is a very experienced referee. George had his head low and I had a free shot and the referee had a split-second decision to make. It was dangerous and he had to put the safety of the fighter first.

"Let's have a rematch and sort it out.''

Froch admitted Groves' performance had made him change his views on the Londoner, adding: "As a fighter I have never had disrespect for him.

"As a person he was antagonistic towards me and was being disrespectful and rude. I'm a man of my word. He's a good fighter and I've seen what he can do. He's earned more respect from me in the fight.

"We had a chat, he gave me an answer and I respect him for that. I've got a little more respect for him as a fighter and a little more respect as a person.

"He got booed into the arena and he's getting cheered out of it. But let's not forget who won here. It was a very educated decision.

"I get stuck in and that's why everybody loves me. I gave everyone entertainment and I can't be held responsible for what the referee did.''

Groves protested against the stoppage, insisting: "He caught me with a good shot but that should never have been a stoppage.

"Because he's got this warrior image, he got the benefit of the doubt. Because I've got this chinny image it was stopped prematurely, in my opinion.

"I know I'm going to be a great fighter. I had it taken away from me tonight. I'll come back better and stronger, and I hope I get that chance.''

update btd

[bally73]

Hearn May of had something to do with it how much is a rematch worth again ?

[Tony2005]

Its a good job that ref wasnt in charge of the West Ham v Chelsea game

as they wouldnt have come out for the second half.....

[tiredeyes]

Another bloody terrible refereeing decision

Did you see the score cards?

Two judges only had Groves ahead by 1 point, while the other had Groves (rightfully imo) ahead by 5 points, absolutely rigged to death that match, no way they were letting Froch lose there, had all the angles covered, a bought ref and two bought judges, so shady.

Froch could have easily had a point deducted too but surprise, surprise, he didn't.

[Tony2005]

I thought Groves was exceptional and was rightly ahead when the fight was stopped..


I had him 2 or maybe 3 rounds ahead in what was a difficult fight to score after the first two rounds...


But the stoppage is the talking point ....


A lot of people have said the ref shouldnt have stopped it but.....


About 10 seconds before the stoppage the commentator said Groves legs had gone after taking a big right hand and he was stumbling a bit before Froch hit him again with three great punches..


Groves i think would have been on the canvass if the ref had not stepped in and although he might have got up the fight would have been over within another round if not before.


When Benn fought Eubank the first time in Birmingham Benn was stopped on his feet by Richard Steele and was never down...Eubank was down a round earlier.....See the end here....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CJLh6kH7sM


As for a rematch.....Why not.


But i think Froch will now know what to expect this time and i see him starting a lot quicker and finishing Groves within 6 rounds should they meet again.